[UPDATE: The video has been taken down. I'm leaving this post up to preserve the comments.]
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Europe, 1000-2005 in 3 and a half minutes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
''He has a sensitivity to the limits of knowing truth …
together with courage to push those limits in many areas.''
— a reader
[UPDATE: The video has been taken down. I'm leaving this post up to preserve the comments.]
5 comments:
Cool. Assume an average of one war per change on the map. (There would have been some map changes due to peaceful dynastic succession, but also some wars that didn't result in map changes. Also some of the big wars like WWII resulted in more than one map change.) Sustain that for a thousand years and see if you don't want to become a unified, peace-loving continent of government-protected office workers and intellectuals.
How would "dynastic succession" cause a change in two countries' borderlines?
In many ways! If, for example, A German prince married a Polish princess who brought a little of Poland with her as a present and added it to his realm. Or if a Holy Roman Emperor divided his lands among his sons, which might occur peacefully at first but then lead to internecine war and further boundary changes. (A lot of this stuff happened in the Holy Roman and Hapsburg empires. Also when Napoleon doled out his conquered lands to his family.)
The map's not available any more, due to copy right issues it says. -Susan
Woops! I wonder if I indirectly caused it to get taken down by posting the link to Metafilter.
Post a Comment